🚀 go-pugleaf

> Anyway, also if SVGA chips cost less than the phone call to order them, 
> the
> 200MIPS CPU needed to get something not ridicolous from them costs a 
> lot.
> 
> Or we would see 8088+SVGA everywhere. :D

I don't understand your problem. With a high-resolution screen (eg 
800x600) you are obviously going to need a faster CPU to update a 
screenfull of data than on a 320x256 screen, whatever the chipset. SVGA 
has nothing to do with it, AAA would have had exactly the same problem.

Whatever chipset is used you don't *have* to run it at 800x600 or higher, 
an SVGA chipset with the correct drivers will give you 320x256 at 65K 
colours which would be fine for many games, and *heaps* faster to access 
(even for a 'slow' CPU) than AGA or any theoretical extended AGA chipset.

Jolyon