Article View: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Article #9090Re: Which is better? VistaPro or Scenery Animator?
From: Chris Hanson
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 1996 08:24
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 1996 08:24
22 lines
1366 bytes
1366 bytes
Wendell Watanabe (wendell@eskimo.com) wrote: : TO> Didn't WCS v1 only require 3Mb? : Don't know. I had heard about WCS before and seen some nice renderings, but : was fairly happy with VistaPro and Scenery Animator. Not anymore! Well, as a bare minimum, you can get the program loaded and do some stuff in 3-4Mb, but I would not try doing much in the way of hi-res animation with any kind of detail. : TO> Was the output from that as realistic (apart from reflections and : TO> clouds obviously)? : I don't think so. From what I've seen, it's vastly improved! General landscape detail, tree/foliage realism and antialiasing have all been improved, in addition to the new water, cloud, rock and atmospheric effects in V2. : wendell@eskimo.com Chris - Xenon Questar Productions questar@netcom.com, xenon@arcticus.burner.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<questarDpHGoo.Czn@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!questarReferences:
<4ibtlt$d46@news.internetmci.com> <oj6g2avlfus.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com> <1399.6669T1420T210@eskimo.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!questar From: questar@netcom.com (Chris Hanson) Subject: Re: Which is better? VistaPro or Scenery Animator? Message-ID: <questarDpHGoo.Czn@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <4ibtlt$d46@news.internetmci.com> <oj6g2avlfus.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com> <1399.6669T1420T210@eskimo.com> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 1996 08:24:24 GMT Sender: questar@netcom15.netcom.com