Article View: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Article #9136Re: Which is better? VistaPro or Scenery Animator?
From: Wendell Watanabe
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 11:30
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 11:30
23 lines
1342 bytes
1342 bytes
On the subject of Re: Which is better? VistaPro or Scenery Animator?, Dave Gentry had this to say... DG> questar@netcom.com (Chris Hanson) wrote: DG> Concerning WCS v2: >> General landscape detail, tree/foliage realism and antialiasing have >>all been improved, in addition to the new water, cloud, rock and >>atmospheric effects in V2. DG> I heard that the trees in WCS were actually bitmapped images, that DG> looked fake when zooming in. I also heard that the trees/foliage in DG> Vista Pro were more convincing at close range. Oh, I dunno, have you had a look at "Brookside" on the Questar web site? http://www.dimensional.com/~questar/ Looks pretty darn good to me! wendell@eskimo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<707.6673T1007T2052@eskimo.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!newsReferences:
<4ibtlt$d46@news.internetmci.com> <oj6g2avlfus.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com> <1399.6669T1420T210@eskimo.com> <questarDpHGoo.Czn@netcom.com> <4kbcr5$i0a@news.internetmci.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!news From: wendell@eskimo.com (Wendell Watanabe) Subject: Re: Which is better? VistaPro or Scenery Animator? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: tia1.eskimo.com Message-ID: <707.6673T1007T2052@eskimo.com> Sender: news@eskimo.com (News User Id) Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) References: <4ibtlt$d46@news.internetmci.com> <oj6g2avlfus.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com> <1399.6669T1420T210@eskimo.com> <questarDpHGoo.Czn@netcom.com> <4kbcr5$i0a@news.internetmci.com> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 11:30:39 GMT