fbl or CPUBlit?

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.graphics

Article #9309

Back to comp.sys.amiga.graphics Previous Next

#9309

From: Mark Worden
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 17:14

16 lines
1155 bytes

Can anyone tell me which is better to use, fbl or CPUBlit for speeding up 
the Amiga's display (supposedly)?  I have an A3000/030/25MHz, and I'm 
wondering if either of these programs can pose any kind of problem, 
perhaps causing the system to crash at any time, etc.

Do they actually make any difference?  I've tried each one, and I didn't 
really notice anything...except my machine seemed to crash more often, 
but it may have been something else causing that.

Thanks.

--
/ Mark Worden                           mworden@public.compusult.nf.ca \
| St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada      Member of TEAM AMIGA           |
| "The smallest good deed is greater than the best good intention."    |
\ "John Doe: generic tractor the John Deere Co. is coming out with."   /

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4l8hl5$qh7@hobbes.compusult.nf.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.compusult.nf.ca!mworden

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.compusult.nf.ca!mworden
From: mworden@public.compusult.nf.ca (Mark Worden)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Subject: fbl or CPUBlit?
Date: 19 Apr 1996 17:14:12 GMT
Organization: Compusult Limited - Public Access Unix
Message-ID: <4l8hl5$qh7@hobbes.compusult.nf.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: public.compusult.nf.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]