🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4l8hl5$qh7@hobbes.compusult.nf.ca> mworden@public.compusult.nf.ca (Mark Worden) writes:
> Can anyone tell me which is better to use, fbl or CPUBlit for speeding up 
> the Amiga's display (supposedly)?  I have an A3000/030/25MHz, and I'm 
> wondering if either of these programs can pose any kind of problem, 
> perhaps causing the system to crash at any time, etc.
> 
> Do they actually make any difference?  I've tried each one, and I didn't 
> really notice anything...except my machine seemed to crash more often, 
> but it may have been something else causing that.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> / Mark Worden                           mworden@public.compusult.nf.ca \
> | St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada      Member of TEAM AMIGA           |
> | "The smallest good deed is greater than the best good intention."    |
> \ "John Doe: generic tractor the John Deere Co. is coming out with."   /

They both speed it up significantly.  I don't know which is better.  But AIBB
noted more than subtle changes.

Jaeson K.
-- 
 ____            ____            _           _
( |  \          ( /  \          ( )       _ / )
 )|   )_   __    /   /_   _  __  /   __  ( X_)
( |  /~ \ /\_)  /---~/ ) / )/  )/~\ /\_)  / _
 )ll/  l/ \__ (/   (/   (_//__//  / \__  (___)
(____________)        (___/        (___)

Jaeson Koszarsky                  Amiga 3000
----------------                  -----------
cyberprophet@psu.edu              68040/25Mhz
jbk4@email.psu.edu                24Megs-ZIP
                                  OS3.1