🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Article #9365

Re: Amiga vs (IBM & Mac)

#9365
From: Steve Lopez
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 1994 10:19
64 lines
4455 bytes
Alexis David Dinno (myrtle@uclink.berkeley.edu) wrote:
: ANYONE who has compared the specs of the '040 and the 486 knows that the 
: Motorola processor rocks far ahead.  Dual MMUs, Dual FFPs, built in cache,
: sustained 21 CISC MIPs, the Complex Instruction Set allows the '040 to 
: process 6 instructions simmultaneously PER cycle with NO loss of speed...and
: lets not even talk about the '060/Pentium difference.

I didnt want to get involved...but I cant help it.

Got this from an extensive article comparing the two.  It is a reprint
from a tech journal somewhere, and can be found on gopher (somewhere) 
I've lost the info on what gopher, but will try and find it and post it.
Heres the graphs from the article.

Performance Benchmarks


Dhrystone Benchmark Version 2.1   (Integer Performance Test -- ALU)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     System               Results - Kdhrystones/s            Relative
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
VAX 11/780                        1.6                           1.0
Motorola MC68030 (50 Mhz,1ws)    20.0                          12.5
Intel 80486 (25 Mhz)             24.0                          15.0
SPARC (25 Mhz)                   27.0                          16.8
Motorola M88000 (20 Mhz)         33.3                          20.1
MIPS M/2000, R3000 (25 Mhz)      39.4                          23.8
Motorola MC68040 (25 Mhz)        40.0                          24.3
Intel 80860 (33.3 Mhz)           67.3                          40.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



Linpack Benchmark (Double-Precision, 100x100)   (F-P Performance Test -- FPU)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     System               Results - MFLOPS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
VAX 11/780                        0.14
NS32532 + NS32381                 0.17
Intel 80386 + 80387 (20 Mhz)      0.20
VAX 8600                          0.49
Intel 80486 (25 Mhz)              1.0
Motorola M88000 (20 Mhz)          1.2
Sun SPARCstation 1                1.3
Decstation 3100 (MIPS R2000)      1.6
Sun 4/200 (SPARC)                 1.6
Am29000 (25 Mhz)                  1.71
IBM 3081                          2.1
Motorola MC68040 (25 Mhz)         3.0
R3000/R3010 (25 Mhz)              3.9
Intel 80860                       4.5
RS/6000 (25 Mhz)                 10.9
Cray 1S                          12.0
Cray X-MP                        56.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


I love it...  even for the cray's! Note that the Intel 486 is way down the
list from the '040 and '060?   Have fun, hope this doesnt stir up more of
a rats nest, but speedwise, these are the facts.  OS's?  Well, that's a
different story.....


Steve L.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2hllsf$k6f@cyberspace.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!news.sprintlink.net!news.world.net!cyberspace.com!cyberspace.com!not-for-mail
References: <CJ1wpF.FJ8@news.Hawaii.Edu> <2gt9a5$dkf@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au> <2gteft$2bg@snuffie.adacel.com.au> <1994Jan14.225317.30207@scorch.hna.com.au> <2hfhd2$k5c@agate.berkeley.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1096f0,52b73b2c623b1ffb
X-Google-Attributes: gid1096f0,public
X-Google-Thread: f9b5b,52b73b2c623b1ffb
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9b5b,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a8b,52b73b2c623b1ffb
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a8b,public
X-Google-Thread: fee24,52b73b2c623b1ffb
X-Google-Attributes: gidfee24,public
X-Google-Thread: f7e4d,52b73b2c623b1ffb
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7e4d,public
X-Google-Thread: 111ed5,52b73b2c623b1ffb
X-Google-Attributes: gid111ed5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-01-20 10:56:21 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!news.sprintlink.net!news.world.net!cyberspace.com!cyberspace.com!not-for-mail
From: lopez@cyberspace.com (Steve Lopez)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics,aus.computers.amiga,bit.listserv.i-amiga,comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.games
Subject: Re: Amiga vs (IBM & Mac)
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.graphics,aus.computers.amiga,bit.listserv.i-amiga,comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.games
Date: 20 Jan 1994 02:19:59 -0800
Organization: Braindead Video Central
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <2hllsf$k6f@cyberspace.com>
References: <CJ1wpF.FJ8@news.Hawaii.Edu> <2gt9a5$dkf@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au> <2gteft$2bg@snuffie.adacel.com.au> <1994Jan14.225317.30207@scorch.hna.com.au> <2hfhd2$k5c@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cyberspace.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL0]