Re: NewIcons v MagicWB (was What I want from new Workbench)

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.introduction

Article #2096

Back to comp.sys.amiga.introduction Previous Next

#2096

From: Peter Routsis
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 20:12

14 lines
911 bytes

>NEWICONS AND ICONOGRAPHICS ARE FAR BETTER THEN MAGIC WB!!

>Why do people pay decent money to register such crappy boring magic wb icons

>Once again finally!  MAGIC WB ICONS ARE BORING SHITE WHICH LACK COLOUR AND
>ARE
>                                     C   R   A   P   !!!!!


If you like the MAC- icons (No frames, just the image..) there is a little
prog."NODraw". Combined with NewIcon2, it is the absolute best looking WB- for
me at least .
 - - - peter- - -

Technical Details

Message-ID: <469.6659T1272T1447@atnet.at>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!atlantis.atnet.at!usenet

References: <314EF04F.41C6@cs.strath.ac.uk> <2385.6656T1088T2183@froghall.powernet.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!atlantis.atnet.at!usenet
From: rabauke@atnet.at (Peter Routsis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.introduction
Subject: Re: NewIcons v MagicWB (was What I want from new Workbench)
Date: 26 Mar 96 21:12:28 +0100
Message-ID: <469.6659T1272T1447@atnet.at>
References: <314EF04F.41C6@cs.strath.ac.uk> <2385.6656T1088T2183@froghall.powernet.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: atnet24.atnet.at
X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP)

Reply to Parent Message