🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1326.6658T1202T2128@in.net>, mave@in.net (John J. Maver, Jr.) writes:

>Does that mean that it is not worth upgrading to mm400?  I was
>thinking about it so that it would work.

There are a number of features in MM400 that is worth the $49 USD ugrade
price.  Visit our Website at http://www.scala.com for more information
on MM400.

>Any plans to add support for cybergfx?

Not in the existing Scala Amiga products.  The low-level design of our
existing software code is highly optimized and therefore, too
inflexible to incorporate RTG/EGS boards.

What would be ideal, is to port our new BackBone(tm) software technology,
which is a platform independent, binary independent, modular and scalable
environment, back to the Amiga.  The question is, which Amiga platform?
ECS/AGA or Power Amiga?

I don't have a clear answer for you.  There are still some things that
Amiga Technology and Scala have to work out.

>Could you please elaborate more on how to use it on my A4000?

What is there to elaborate on?  Simply disable the Cybergrafx drivers
and use the standard 23-pin video port for output.  Again our software
products only supports the ECS/AGA chipset.  In other words, use
our product as if the Cybergrafx board was not installed.

If your final output is video, then you'll need a RGB to Composite
Encoder or a Genlock.



Regards,

John Chang
____

John Chang, Technical Support Manager, Scala, Inc. USA

Websites: http://www.scala.com or http://www.scala.no
USA Technical Support: mailto://tech.support@scala.com
USA Sales Information: mailto://sales@scala.com

"Multimedia by SCALA.  Why Make It Harder?"
Scala Computer Television
____

"Too bad she won't live.  But then again, who does." - Gaf (BladeRunner)