Article View: comp.sys.amiga.multimedia
Article #1708Re: Defense of SCALA and John Chang
From: john.chang
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 15:17
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 15:17
80 lines
3752 bytes
3752 bytes
In <4l5ksv$lf@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>, apierre@ix.netcom.com(Anthony R Pierre) writes: >It seems that if someone disagrees with what is going on, then they are >to be ignored? Personally, I did not imply nor state that. That is your conclusion. If it is. >I am a registered Scala owner for the Amiga. I have >stated that I love the product and use it extensivley in my video work. >I appreciate how easy it is to use, yet how powerful it is. My concern >though is that after MM400 there might not be anymore support for the >Amiga. Well, you'll just have to find out. I don't have the answer for you. Frankly, I don't think anybody does. We'll have to see what VISCorp plans for the platform and the market. Its simply too early to tell. >Yes, I have read the Amiga Report IRC. I have read Mr. Chang's >messages here. And they are very optimistic about the MM100 (and >knowing what they have done already with Scala, I the app must be a >'killer' product). Well, I'm glad you read the IRC logs. Now, wait a minute. First you say: >I see nothing wrong with making products for other platforms. They >are in business to make money, and what platform has the greatest potential. >The PC. Then you say: >But there is this nagging feeling that unless there is a PowerAmiga >that is sold in large enough quantities, there really wont be any >more Amiga upgrades. Reading Mr. Chang's messages said "if". That to >me means "no" until those "if's" are met. If we are in the business to make money, is there any reason why we should treat the Scala Amiga product business model differently? Also, if you had read the IRC logs thoroughly, you would have ready that we cannot add any new features to the existing source code, because one, it is highly optimized and that adding any new features would require a complete rewrite. Second, adding any new features to the existing source code, could make the product unstable. This is one reason why we went through the trouble of developing "Scala BackBone(tm)"! If you want newer versions of our software, then obviously a market must exist and at least has the potential of growth. That isn't happening right now. You can't put the horse in front of the cart, unless somebody is willing to pay for it. :) >Right now, we have no idea what is going to happen to the Amiga. Sold >again. Mr. Chang says that my view is myopic. I tend to think that it >is realistic with the information that I have. I sincerely hope that I >am wrong, but until someone (Mr. Chang, Viscorp, AT) tell me >otherwise... And telling me that there are things that cant be said >about future upgrades doesnt help either. Well, it seems you are going to have to move along without this knowledge, like the rest of us, until VISCorp and/or Amiga Technology says otherwise. Regards, John Chang ____ John Chang, Technical Support Manager, Scala, Inc. USA Websites: http://www.scala.com or http://www.scala.no USA Technical Support: mailto://tech.support@scala.com USA Sales Information: mailto://sales@scala.com "Multimedia by SCALA. Why Make It Harder?" Scala Computer Television ____ "Too bad she won't live. But then again, who does." - Gaf (BladeRunner)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1996Apr19.151754.5043@scala.scala.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!scala!newsReferences:
<1776CA48DS86.JWILDE@ukcc.uky.edu> <4l5ksv$lf@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.multimedia Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!scala!news From: john.chang@scala.com Subject: Re: Defense of SCALA and John Chang Sender: news@scala.scala.com (Usenet administrator) Message-ID: <1996Apr19.151754.5043@scala.scala.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 15:17:54 GMT Reply-To: john.chang@scala.com References: <1776CA48DS86.JWILDE@ukcc.uky.edu> <4l5ksv$lf@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> Nntp-Posting-Host: panda Organization: Scala Inc.