🚀 go-pugleaf

>In article <hU0ky*Br2@wolf359.exile.org>,
>Eric Edwards <eric@wolf359.exile.org> wrote:
>>In article <4j4tq3$349@news.mistral.co.uk>, Lars Janssen writes:
>>
>>> IBrowse has more good features, but also (understandably) more bugs.
>>> For a version which admits to being far from finished it's very good.
>>> If I'm not mistaken, the people behind IBrowse used to work on
>>> AMosaic.  Amosaic went through several versions before it was
>>> truly reliable...  let's hope the finished IBrowse is stable too.
>>
>>When did AMosaic become truly reliable?  Mine crashes all the time.
>>You're saying Ibrowse and AWeb are *less* reliable?

>Much less reliable on my system, with IBrowse the worst of the lot.  AWeb
>only  rarely hangs, but doesn't do things like forms, some graphics, and some
>downloads,  where Mosaic plods along but handles virtually everything thrown
>at it, even if it  can't display it.  About the only time it freezes up is
>when the system is under  very heavy use.  Not as fancy or fast, but I'll
>take it any day until the others  are as reliable.  (with AmitCP or MLINK,
>PPP, MUI 3.3. on an A1200 030 w/ 4M fast  ram added).

I use Amosaic myself because it's the most stable. I may lose my connection
sometimes  but my hard drive has never been trashed. I run Ibrowse on a
seperate 25 mg partition and I've had to reformat that partition twice. To
tell you the truth, because of the bad experiences with Ibrowse, i haven't
even tried Aweb.

Eric D. Jackson
ejack@user1.channel1.com