🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <hU0ky*Br2@wolf359.exile.org>,
Eric Edwards <eric@wolf359.exile.org> wrote:
>In article <4j4tq3$349@news.mistral.co.uk>, Lars Janssen writes:
>
>> IBrowse has more good features, but also (understandably) more bugs.
>> For a version which admits to being far from finished it's very good.
>> If I'm not mistaken, the people behind IBrowse used to work on
>> AMosaic.  Amosaic went through several versions before it was
>> truly reliable...  let's hope the finished IBrowse is stable too.
>
>When did AMosaic become truly reliable?  Mine crashes all the time. 
>You're saying Ibrowse and AWeb are *less* reliable?

Much less reliable on my system, with IBrowse the worst of the lot.  AWeb only 
rarely hangs, but doesn't do things like forms, some graphics, and some downloads, 
where Mosaic plods along but handles virtually everything thrown at it, even if it 
can't display it.  About the only time it freezes up is when the system is under 
very heavy use.  Not as fancy or fast, but I'll take it any day until the others 
are as reliable.  (with AmitCP or MLINK, PPP, MUI 3.3. on an A1200 030 w/ 4M fast 
ram added).

>
>----
>"Not many fishes, in the sea.  Not many fishes, just Londo and me"
>Remember the home hobbyist computer: Born 1975, died April 29, 1994
>


-- 
>>>>>>>>>>      On Indian Time - Go Around     (Bumper sticker) <<<<<<<<<<
* I'm just a student - I do not represent the UW or Washington State DOH *
* My Pneumococcus study, Redstone powwows, & Osage Nation pics on Web pg *
* djarvis@u.washington.edu or http://weber.u.washington.edu/~djarvis     *