🚀 go-pugleaf

Eric Edwards (eric@wolf359.exile.org) wrote:
> In article <4j4tq3$349@news.mistral.co.uk>, Lars Janssen writes:
> 
> > IBrowse has more good features, but also (understandably) more bugs.
> > For a version which admits to being far from finished it's very good.
> > If I'm not mistaken, the people behind IBrowse used to work on
> > AMosaic.  Amosaic went through several versions before it was
> > truly reliable...  let's hope the finished IBrowse is stable too.
> 
> When did AMosaic become truly reliable?  Mine crashes all the time. 
> You're saying Ibrowse and AWeb are *less* reliable?

OK, 'truly reliable' may be pushing it a bit, but I haven't had many
problems with the last one I got (some time ago) - version 2.0
pre-release (Sep 1 1995).  Have there been any later versions?

I still use Lynx most of the time, which has never crashed on me...
but of the graphical browsers, AMosaic has proved the most reliable
for me.

Lars.

-- 

                     Lars Janssen --> lars@mistral.co.uk
                     --- Still dreaming about Kelle! ---
  <<Eternal web site>>                                 <<My home page>>
  http://lars.keme.net/eternal/          http://www.mistral.co.uk/lars/