🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3064.6659T1306T1965@atnet.at> rabauke@atnet.at (Peter Routsis) writes:
>>>
>>> In article <884.6645T797T2962@atnet.at>: "JAVA"
>>> Peter Routsis <rabauke@atnet.at> wrote:
>>>
>>> PR> english: Sorry we do not have any own involvment in the moment with
>>> JAVA . PR> There are external activities and we can not afford , to waste
>>> anything for PR> parallel jobs. PR> PR> ---peter--- PR> PR> PS.:my personal
>>> opinion: As it looks AT is again like C ignoring major developments, pity.
>
>exactly why I bothered to ask P.Kittel about AT's involvement- and why his
>answer seemed rather "short-sighted" to me. Because noone can ignore JAVA
>anymore,

How do you come to the conclusion that we ignore JAVA? I said that we
are aware of the issue, but that it's obviously not necessary to do
*another* version ourselves, as there is already some promising effort
going on. I don't understand your point.

This would be the same as blaming us to ignore UNIX, because we put no
effort into reviving AmigaUNIX, while there are *two* competing versions
alive out there, NetBSD and Linux.

And I'm still a bit angry, that someone posts publicly from a private
email exchange with myself.

>But more and more programmers will not support the Amiga anymore,
>simple it does not work out financially, which can be understood easily.

Your conclusions are astonishing and plainly wrong. Please spare us
such unfounded whinings. Talking down the Amiga in public is not a way
to support the platform. And this was no justified criticism, but plain
bullshit.

-- 
Best Regards, Dr. Peter Kittel       //    Visit  http://www.amiga.de
Private Site in Frankfurt, Germany \X/  Email to: peterk@combo.ganesha.com
Employed at AMIGA Technologies GmbH in Bensheim, Germany