🚀 go-pugleaf

Paul Kolenbrander (paul@serena.iaehv.nl) wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Apr 96, Per Jacobsen typed the following line(s):

> > True, it would be much nicer to have it all in one that 500 different
> > programs. At least for the basics, another of one Netscapes success
> > probably. The sensible is build in, and you can plugin the more extreme.

> The sensible is built-in?

Perhaps i should rephrase it to "attempts to have the sensible build in"

> Youmust not frequent newsgroups that have
> a lot of posters using Netscape's newsreader. duplicate and triplicate
> posts (and more) are abundand there. Because of that stupid Newsreader.

Oh? A bug?

> Or hwo about the rescnt binary posts here? Several of them where by
> netscape users mixing up the reply and post buttons. I don't call
> that sensible at all...

Hey, a stupid user is a stupid user, regardless of the program he uses.

> Sorry, I had to get that off my chest... :-)

That's quit ok Paul, did it help? If not you could always go next door 
and beat up the neightbours kid ;-)