Re: MEMF_PHYSICAL?

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #114

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#114

From: Peter da Silva
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1989 05:40

11 lines
884 bytes

In article <8906160430.AA09545@jade.berkeley.edu>, 451061@UOTTAWA.BITNET (Valentin Pepelea) writes:
> This is not the ideal implementation, but it is the best one the 68851 can
> offer.

What does the 68451 have to do with the AmigaDOS memory layout? The MMU wasn't
even considered when the OS was written.

You're blaming the hardware for the sins of the software.
-- 
Peter "Have you hugged your wolf today" da Silva      `-_-'
...texbell!sugar!peter, or peter@sugar.hackercorp.com  'U`

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3936@sugar.hackercorp.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!peter

References: <8906160430.AA09545@jade.berkeley.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: MEMF_PHYSICAL?
Message-ID: <3936@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 20 Jun 89 05:40:04 GMT
References: <8906160430.AA09545@jade.berkeley.edu>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message