Re: Delays without locking machine

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #11794

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#11794

From: David Donley
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1989 06:00

11 lines
983 bytes

Make sure you do Delay(50L) rather than Delay(50) if you are not compiling
with the +l option, or else Delay() will end up getting a random number which
will probably be larger than you want to wait...
Classic_-_Concepts@cup.portal.com writes:
>
>    Could someone suggest ways of coding Delays without using the DELAY
>function which locks up the machine.  I am using Aztec 3.6.     - Dan

                              Call my BBS at (213) 372-4494
               Disclaimer: If it doesn't work, you did something wrong.
        ddave@pnet02.CTS.COM ddave@pnet.gryphon.COM killer!gryphon!pnet02!ddave

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13292@gryphon.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ames!elroy!gryphon!pnet02!ddave

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ames!elroy!gryphon!pnet02!ddave
From: ddave@pnet02.cts.com (David Donley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Delays without locking machine
Message-ID: <13292@gryphon.COM>
Date: 14 Mar 89 06:00:19 GMT
Sender: root@gryphon.COM
Organization: People-Net [pnet02], Redondo Beach, CA.
Lines: 11