🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <DEVEN.89Mar31025148@daniel.pawl.rpi.edu> shadow@pawl.rpi.edu (Deven T. Corzine) writes:
>Say you've got 2 processes, each sending messages to the other.  Is
>there or is there not a need to separate reply ports from message
>ports [as receiving points, not reply-receiving points] or can you
>have a single message port for each process, using it as the
>destination port for the messages the other process sends, and as the
>reply port for any messages the process spends.  That book implied
>you'd need one port for the other process to send messages to, and
>another to receive the reply messages for messages you send to the
>other process...   What's the actuality?

	You can use the port for recieving either.  ReplyMsg is essentially
{msg->mn_Node.ln_Type = NT_REPLYMSG; PutMsg(msg->mn_ReplyPort,msg);}.  Not
exactly that, but you get the idea.

	On another note: deven, you've shown up in the top 25 posters on
all of usenet by messages.  Try to include less "ok, I'll do that" and
included text in your messages, please.

	Thanks

-- 
Randell Jesup, Commodore Engineering {uunet|rutgers|allegra}!cbmvax!jesup