Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #12171Re: New Manx Was: macro buffer size for Lattice and/or Manx
From: Robert M. Wolff
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1989 19:22
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1989 19:22
23 lines
1362 bytes
1362 bytes
From article <16429@oberon.USC.EDU>, by papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa): > In article <6507@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> wolff@cs.purdue.EDU (Robert M. Wolff) writes: >>On the subject of Manx...does anybody know when/if manx 4.1 will be out? > > Never. They'll wait for 5.0. > 5.0?? Arrgh, what's the reasoning behind that? I was under the impression that 4.1 was ANSI standard and it was going to be quite nice. What is it missing that 5.0 will have? I'm also worried about manx losing its share of amigans too. The manx/ lattice war is certainly not new (each one putting a new release out very close to each other), and right now I feel that lattice probably has a pretty good edge over manx 3.6. (speed/tight code/etc) Not trying to start a compiler war here...just inquiring... :-) bob -- -=-=-=- Insert Standard Disclaimer Here, Please... -=-=-=- /************* MS-Dos? Me? No, You must be mistaken! *************/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6515@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!wolffReferences:
<16429@oberon.USC.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!wolff From: wolff@cs.purdue.EDU (Robert M. Wolff) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: New Manx Was: macro buffer size for Lattice and/or Manx Message-ID: <6515@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> Date: 10 Apr 89 19:22:05 GMT References: <16429@oberon.USC.EDU> Distribution: na Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University Lines: 23