Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #12293Re: RastPort structure definition
From: Jim Mackraz
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1989 20:26
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1989 20:26
20 lines
1283 bytes
1283 bytes
In article <963@psueea.UUCP> bartonr@psu-cs.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton) writes:
)From rastport.h : From rastport.i :
)struct RastPort STRUCTURE RastPort,0
){
... ...
) BYTE linpatcnt; BYTE rp_Dummy
) BYTE dummy; BYTE rp_linpatcnt
)
) Note the reversal of linpatcnt and dummy. Anyone know which is correct?
The one on the left is correct. I believe that neither of these fields
are suitable for direct manipulation or examination, so I hope this answer
doesn't matter to you.
jimm
--
Jim Mackraz, I and I Computing "He's hidden now, but you can see
{cbmvax,well,oliveb}!amiga!jimm The bubbles where he breathes."
- Shriekback
Opinions are my own. Comments are not to be taken as Commodore official policy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3754@amiga.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!oliveb!amiga!jimmReferences:
<963@psueea.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!oliveb!amiga!jimm From: jimm@amiga.UUCP (Jim Mackraz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: RastPort structure definition Message-ID: <3754@amiga.UUCP> Date: 18 Apr 89 20:26:49 GMT References: <963@psueea.UUCP> Reply-To: jimm@cloyd.UUCP (Jim Mackraz) Organization: Commodore-Amiga Inc, Los Gatos CA Lines: 20