Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #12567Re: File Requesters
From: Darren New
Date: Tue, 09 May 1989 17:09
Date: Tue, 09 May 1989 17:09
11 lines
1160 bytes
1160 bytes
In article <11584@well.UUCP> shf@well.UUCP (Stuart H. Ferguson) writes: >Is a filename equivalent to a lock? A lock would have the advantage that >the file won't go away while you're waiting to process it, but a name >would have the advantage that you could handle the exceptions yourself. >What's the tradeoff here? One obvious problem with returning a Lock is that the file must exist for you to lock it. If I want a "Save File" requester, this is clearly unacceptable. Possibly yet another flag to indicate whether locks or names should be returned is appropriate, given that we are building the Ultimate File Requester (tm). -- Darren
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15008@louie.udel.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!udel!newReferences:
<6342@ardent.UUCP> <103440@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <3795@sugar.hackercorp.com> <11584@well.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!udel!new From: new@udel.EDU (Darren New) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: File Requesters Keywords: REENTRANT FILE REQUESTERS Message-ID: <15008@louie.udel.EDU> Date: 9 May 89 17:09:09 GMT References: <6342@ardent.UUCP> <103440@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <3795@sugar.hackercorp.com> <11584@well.UUCP> Sender: usenet@udel.EDU Reply-To: new@udel.EDU (Darren New) Distribution: na Organization: University of Delaware Lines: 11