🚀 go-pugleaf

shadow@pawl.rpi.edu (Deven T. Corzine) writes:
>
>On 8 Sep 89 03:40:25 GMT, ddave@pnet02.gryphon.com (David Donley) said:
>
>ddave> If hard links are faster than aliases, you will get a package
>ddave> with $1000 in it.
>
>Your original statements and replies to followups are a convincing
>testimony that you don't understand the purposes of hard links, soft
>links, and the relation to aliases.  (which is slim.)  Aliases are a
>command substitution, links make multiple pathnames refer to the same
>file.  The functions are completely different, performed at a
>different level, and have different, only somewhat overlapping, uses.
>For example, normally compress and uncompress are the same executable
>file, linked.  But they are, as someone else mentioned, universal.
>Aliases are part of a user's environment.  Moreover, using an alias
>for uncompress to point to compress would not WORK.  When
>compress/uncompress runs, it checks it's executable name, and if it
>was done with an alias, the name would be "compress".  If a link,
>"uncompress".  See a difference?
>
>Deven
>--
>Deven T. Corzine        Internet:  deven@rpi.edu, shadow@pawl.rpi.edu
>Snail:  2151 12th St. Apt. 4, Troy, NY 12180   Phone:  (---) --none--
>Bitnet:  deven@rpitsmts, userfxb6@rpitsmts     UUCP:  uunet!rpi!deven
>Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible.

If I don't understand links, that's my problem not yours.  You have a serious
problem.  When you don't understand somebody's ideas, you tell them things
they already know.  If you REALLY are trying to be informative, don't be
nasty, or send mail.  This is the .tech conference, not an neantherthal
yell-out.
 
-----
Mail to ddave@pnet02.gryphon.com