Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #12811Re: Trouble with Images
From: Tom Limoncelli
Date: Tue, 23 May 1989 18:52
Date: Tue, 23 May 1989 18:52
22 lines
1327 bytes
1327 bytes
In article <1410019@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM> stan@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM (Stan Gibbs) writes:
> 5.02 Manual. The addition of the "chip" keyword to ensure that data hunks
> are placed in CHIP memory was what I was missing. I have 1Meg of Fast RAM
> in my 1000, so the default was to load the image data hunks in Fast RAM.
>
> Changing my image data declaration to:
>
> USHORT chip imagepts[] ...
To be 100% ANSI conformant (that is, when ANSI gets officially adopted
and products can really be ANSI conformant) wouldn't they NOT be
allowed to add a keyword like "chip"? Shouldn't it be "_chip" to
conform to the namespace requirements? (venders can use all the
symbols that begin with "_")
-Tom
--
Tom Limoncelli -- tlimonce@drunivac.Bitnet -- limonce@pilot.njin.net
Drew University -- Box 1060, Madison, NJ -- 201-408-5389
Standard Disclaimer: I am not the mouth-piece of Drew University
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<May.23.14.52.22.1989.3122@pilot.njin.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!njin!limonceReferences:
<1410018@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM> <1410019@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!njin!limonce From: limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Trouble with Images Message-ID: <May.23.14.52.22.1989.3122@pilot.njin.net> Date: 23 May 89 18:52:23 GMT References: <1410018@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM> <1410019@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM> Organization: NJ InterCampus Network, New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 22