Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #12906Re: MEMF_PHYSICAL?
From: Valentin Pepelea
Date: Mon, 29 May 1989 19:22
Date: Mon, 29 May 1989 19:22
27 lines
1687 bytes
1687 bytes
Deven Corzine <deven@rpi.edu> writes in
Message-ID: <DEVEN.89May28030529@daniel.rpi.edu>
> "superior functionality"? What is inherently superior about a single
> address space?
Faster message passing, faster context switches (no need to copy memory and
translate addresses (MOVES instruction)), but best of all, the ability of
programs to access its other address space directly. I for one think its really
neat to have hacks such as Vscreen, Dmouse, Snip-It and others which would be
rather impossible to implement if the single addressing space was not used.
> > I stand by the model of the ideal real-time message-based operating system.
>
> Exec is pretty good, but I wouldn't say ideal.
I was saying that ideal is what I propose for virtual memory and memory
protection. Indeed, Exec is not ideal as it stands now, but it will be after
I upgrade it. :-)
Valentin
_________________________________________________________________________
"An operating system without Name: Valentin Pepelea
virtual memory is an operating Phonet: (613) 231-7476 (New!)
system without virtue." Bitnet: 451061@Uottawa.bitnet
Usenet: Use cunyvm.cuny.edu gate
- Ancient Inca Proverb Planet: 451061@acadvm1.UOttawa.CA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8905291930.AA10122@jade.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UOTTAWA.BITNET!451061Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UOTTAWA.BITNET!451061 From: 451061@UOTTAWA.BITNET (Valentin Pepelea) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: MEMF_PHYSICAL? Message-ID: <8905291930.AA10122@jade.berkeley.edu> Date: 29 May 89 19:22:57 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 27