Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #13262Re: Mutual Exclude Gadgets
From: Hans Ridder
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 1989 17:13
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 1989 17:13
18 lines
1465 bytes
1465 bytes
In article <897@doctor.Tymnet.COM> jms@tardis.Tymnet.COM (Joe Smith) writes: >In article <22900@ut-emx.UUCP> hcobb@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Henry J. Cobb) writes: >> Mr Sinz is right, the documented procedure would not work. Why not use >>the field as a bit-map, whenever a gadget becomes selected any other gadgets >>with which it has a matching bit set, is deselected. > >"Which bit is assigned to my first gadget?", since without this information >there is no way to set the proper bit in the bitmask. No, you missed it. His idea was to remove the "positional" meaning of the bits altogether. Go back and re-read his posting, it's a good idea (with one limitation I already posted about). -hans ======================================================================== Hans-Gabriel Ridder Digital Equipment Corporation ridder@elvira.enet.dec.com Customer Support Center ...decwrl!elvira.enet!ridder Colorado Springs, CO
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<559@shodha.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!shlump.nac.dec.com!shodha.dec.com!elvira!ridderReferences:
<22900@ut-emx.UUCP> <897@doctor.Tymnet.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!shlump.nac.dec.com!shodha.dec.com!elvira!ridder From: ridder@elvira.enet.dec.com (Hans Ridder) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Mutual Exclude Gadgets Message-ID: <559@shodha.dec.com> Date: 31 Dec 89 17:13:59 GMT References: <22900@ut-emx.UUCP> <897@doctor.Tymnet.COM> Sender: news@shodha.dec.com Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Customer Support Center Lines: 18