Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #13531Re: GOMF and CPU hogging
From: David Guntner
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 23:28
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 23:28
16 lines
1254 bytes
1254 bytes
From article <1990Feb6.144743.28176@aucs.uucp>, by 880274d@aucs.uucp (Ralph Doncaster):
> I've seen GOMF 2.2 and noticed that it takes up a considerable amount of CPU
> time (according to Xoper).
> Does anyone know if 3.0 is as bad?
Actually, from what I've observed, GOMF is simply sucking up a lot of free
CPU resources. I've noticed when running XOPER to monitor CPU activity, and
have started some other task, that GOMF's CPU percentage will go down to
accomidate (sp?) the new task.
--Dave
--
David Guntner UUCP: {ames, mit-eddie}!attctc!davidg
INET: davidg@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (killer)
"...New ship, but she's got the right name. ...Treat --Admiral L. McCoy
her like a lady, and she'll always bring you home." "Encounter at Farpoint"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11335@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!attctc!davidgReferences:
<1990Feb6.144743.28176@aucs.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!attctc!davidg From: davidg@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (David Guntner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: GOMF and CPU hogging Message-ID: <11335@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 6 Feb 90 23:28:29 GMT References: <1990Feb6.144743.28176@aucs.uucp> Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 16