🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #13593

Re: resource tracking

#13593
From: Checkpoint Technologies
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 1990 16:22
17 lines
1468 bytes
In article <352@amgraf.UUCP> huver@amgraf.UUCP (Huver) writes:
>Is it logical to ask an opreating system to guard against incompetent/
>ignorant/lazy programmers who do not act responsible for their own actions?

	For a time-shared multi-user operating system - Yes.  In fact,
not only should a multi-user operating system protect against
incompetent/ignorant programmers, it needs to protect against malicious/
evil/destructive ones too, those which are bent on the system's
downfall.  Unix definitely falls into this category.

	AmigaDOS does not; it's a single user PC and single user OS, and
that's why I think lack of resource tracking and memory protection is
not gross negligence, just a reasonable design compromise.  Memory
protection is expensive - the cost of an MMU.  Resource tracking
probably should have been there, and in fact CAOS (the original,
undelivered Amiga OS) had it, but Amiga had to abandon that and use
Tripos instead.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <19362@grebyn.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!haven!grebyn!ckp
References: <355.25C92297@weyr.FIDONET.ORG> <926@tardis.Tymnet.COM> <352@amgraf.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!haven!grebyn!ckp
From: ckp@grebyn.com (Checkpoint Technologies)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: resource tracking
Keywords: Discipline, discipline
Message-ID: <19362@grebyn.com>
Date: 9 Feb 90 16:22:06 GMT
References: <355.25C92297@weyr.FIDONET.ORG> <926@tardis.Tymnet.COM> <352@amgraf.UUCP>
Reply-To: ckp@grebyn.UUCP (Checkpoint Technologies)
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing, Vienna, VA, USA
Lines: 17