🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <42700027@m.cs.uiuc.edu> schwager@m.cs.uiuc.edu writes:

schwager> I will, however, continue to doubt the 1.1 RKM's, and as
schwager> soon as I'm done following The The on the Midwestern leg of
schwager> their tour (I'm gonna be a The-head :-), I'll save up and
schwager> buy the 1.2 RKM's.  Hopefully they'll have less head-bashing
schwager> fodder in them.

On 1 Feb 90 16:35:33 GMT, peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) said:

Peter> I hope you mean 1.3.  There never were a set a 1.2 RKM's (there
Peter> was some 1.2 technical info in the 1.2 Enhancer Manual).  I
Peter> hope you are running the 1.3 software too, there still are some
Peter> folks who have 1.2 (or 1.1 (or 1.0!)))

Sure there were!  What about the RKMs published by Addison-Wesley,
with the dopy little pictures of a mouse or something, and a colored
bar across near the top?  They had 1.2 functions in them...  The
volumes were "RKM: Exec", "RKM: Intuition", "RKM: Libraries and
Devices" and "RKM: Hardware Reference Manual".

But I agree no one should look to buy 1.2 RKMs *now* with the
wonderful 1.3 RKMs out now.  (Excellent job, guys, esp. on L&D...)

Deven
-- 
Deven T. Corzine        Internet:  deven@rpi.edu, shadow@pawl.rpi.edu
Snail:  2151 12th St. Apt. 4, Troy, NY 12180   Phone:  (518) 274-0327
Bitnet:  deven@rpitsmts, userfxb6@rpitsmts     UUCP:  uunet!rpi!deven
Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible.