🚀 go-pugleaf

The following is an article I stumbled across in comp.sys.68k.  I am
not an expert on realtime operating systems (I do realize that the
Amiga OS is not realtime) but figured some of you people might
be able to share some of your Amiga experiences with this man.  Maybe
more people can be converted.  I hope this posting is appropriate.

=================QUOTED ARTICLE==================

Article 1512 in comp.sys.m68k:
From: tce@ann.MN.ORG (Thomas C. Evans)
Newsgroups: comp.realtime,comp.windows.misc,comp.os.misc,comp.os.os9,comp.sys.in
tel,comp.sys.m68k
Subject: Search for uC realtime os w/ GUI
Keywords: realtime graphic user interface
Message-ID: <44@ann.MN.ORG>
Date: 9 Feb 90 15:19:43 GMT
Reply-To: tce@ann.MN.ORG (Thomas C. Evans)
Followup-To: comp.realtime
Organization: Kallestad Diagnostics, Chaska, Mn
Lines: 23

I am developing an instrument which requires real time process control
an a user interface.  realTimeUnix+X would be nice.. but the
qualification, learning curve and resources required rule it out.

The current tack (based on external default decisions) is 386sx, Intel
RMX os, and C-worthy character based user interface kit to be ported
from dos.

I want a graphical user interface with the ability to change
languages, and a path to a Japanese user interface.

The processor / os / GUI tool kit are all open ( for about three weeks)
This project needs to move forward about 20 years!

All suggestions and comments about real time performance, look&feel, tools,
support, language interface, reliability welcome!
I will summarize in comp.realtime and comp.so.misc


--
Thomas C. Evans            self is like insanity,                tce@ann.MN.ORG
Minneapolis MN.           its hereditary and you        {umn-cs,amdahl,hpda}...
(612)448-4848 x285       get it from your children           ...!bungia!ann!tce

==================END QUOTED ARTICLE============================
	Bill Hoston
	farhi@athena.mit.edu