🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <23088@usc.edu> papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
>In article <5207@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>>True or not, it's simply irrelevant. Haven't you ever heard of rhetorical
>>effect? Don't you know that 2+2=3, for sufficiently large values of 3?
>
>apply, Peter has shown that he has the brain of a 5-year old, that can't 
>even admit when he f***s up.  Arguments like the one above (note, no
>smileys), are the food of spoiled brats.
>
>Grow up, dude.

Arguments like this are tedious and unconstructive to start with,
but this flame is uncalled for. Marco, Peter may be wrong (who really
cares, though? What's in a word?), but *you* are just being plain
rude.

Comments like that simply make us innocent bystanders think that perhaps
this is a case of "the pot calling the kettle black".

I'm surprised you have the balls to post something that reflects as
badly on you as this does. Have you no shame?

It wouldn't hurt for both of you to make peace and get back to business
as usual. We're professionals, right??
	Doug
-- 
Doug Merritt		{pyramid,apple}!xdos!doug
Member, Crusaders for a Better Tomorrow		Professional Wildeyed Visionary