Re: (Alleged) SKsh deficiencies (Whineing)

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #14085

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#14085

From: Bob Luneski
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 1990 20:52

12 lines
1061 bytes

>Now this was uncalled for.

Agreed. The wording was poorly chosen and was unfortunately an example
of what I was objecting to in Deven's original message. Consider carefully
the implications and fairness of what you write. Apology extended.

____________________________________________________________________________
  Bob Luneski                                                             
                                                                         
  The opinions expressed herein are my own and in no way reflect the     
  opinions of Tektronix, Inc.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8654@pogo.WV.TEK.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!orca.wv.tek.com!pogo!bluneski

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!orca.wv.tek.com!pogo!bluneski
From: bluneski@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Bob Luneski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: (Alleged) SKsh deficiencies (Whineing)
Message-ID: <8654@pogo.WV.TEK.COM>
Date: 7 Mar 90 20:52:37 GMT
Reply-To: bluneski@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Bob Luneski)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Wilsonville,  OR.
Lines: 12