Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #14180Re: Amiga Resource tracking & Protection.
From: Charles Brown
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 1990 00:42
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 1990 00:42
15 lines
1041 bytes
1041 bytes
> If you guys want to give Commodore the mandate to go ahead and drop > backwards compatibility completely for the sake of memory protection, > then go ahead and say so, but keep in mind that the above two points > are the Gospell truth. > Valentin I am in favor of this. There will be a period of pain, but in the end the Amiga will become a much more robust computer. Rather than calling it 1.4 or 1.5, your should probably call it 2.0 since it will not be compatible. -- Charles Brown charles@cv.hp.com or charles%hpcvca@hplabs.hp.com or hplabs!hpcvca!charles or "Hey you!" Not representing my employer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1410044@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!decwrl!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcvca!charlesReferences:
<208.25f3c82b@waikato.ac.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!decwrl!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcvca!charles From: charles@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM (Charles Brown) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Amiga Resource tracking & Protection. Message-ID: <1410044@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM> Date: 12 Mar 90 00:42:32 GMT References: <208.25f3c82b@waikato.ac.nz> Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, Oregon Lines: 15