Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #1803Re: Clean way to kill AUX: cli
From: Jeff Bevis
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1989 22:38
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1989 22:38
17 lines
1480 bytes
1480 bytes
I don't intend to start another hyper-extended round of resource-tracking discussions, but I would like to pose a small(?) question. If one were to keep track of process resources, what would one be keeping track of, aside from memory, message ports, file locks, and, perhaps, semaphores? I've not really given this much thought, but I would like to know what the scope of full resource tracking is. I don't want this post to precipitate more 'we can't do that on the Amiga.' replies; I'm not debating that. I'm just wondering what everyone wishes they could have the OS tracking for them... (aside from the aforementioned). It might be best if responses were emailed to me, since this is an old topic. Thanks for the enlightenment in advance. +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Jeff Bevis (bevis) "But I don't like spam!" | | en.ecn.purdue.edu / ei.ecn.purdue.edu Give me Amiga or nothing at all. | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8910232238.AA18077@en.ecn.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU!bevisShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU!bevis From: bevis@EE.ECN.PURDUE.EDU (Jeff Bevis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Clean way to kill AUX: cli Message-ID: <8910232238.AA18077@en.ecn.purdue.edu> Date: 23 Oct 89 22:38:17 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network Lines: 17