🚀 go-pugleaf

peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>UNIX is not real time. Many of the things we now take for granted would just
Now Now Now...not quite so hasty.  There are extensions to Unix' that make
doing real time work easier.  I think your following comments are more along
the lines of Unix has more overhead then Intuit. which is very true.  But it
also is more portable (even BSD to ATT) then any set of micro OS.
A curious though that just came to mind is that Ada is suppose to be part of
the POSIX standard....Ada is (suppose to) react to certain real time stimili
so I think that implies that POSIX will be able to be used for real time
tasks...???
>not be possible under UNIX, or would be unbearably slow. It would kill the
>Amiga as a platform for MIDI (and music in general), animation, games, and
>other real-time applications. Window and screen updates would slow down by a
>factor of 10 (a 25 MHz 80386 under X is less responsive than a 7 MHz 68000
>under Intuition, and it's about a 5 MIPS machine instead of a .7 MIPS one).
Personal gripe: The acronym MIPS has no real hard meaning.  It is a relative
measurement that is not relative to anything easily tied down....
>Peter "Have you hugged your wolf today" da Silva <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
>`-_-' "IT'S THE TWO GODDAMNED CULTURES AGAIN !*! Bit-brained nerdery on one
> 'U`   side, effete fin-de-siecle malaise on the other. And kingdoms of hybrid
>       delight abandoned in the middle."  -- burns@latcs1.oz (Jonathan Burns)

Michael Hunter

Mike Hunter - Box's and CPU's from HELL: iapx80[012]86, PR1ME 50 Series, 1750a
UUCP: {ames!elroy, <routing site>}!gryphon!pnet02!bagpiper
INET: bagpiper@pnet02.gryphon.com