Re: DMA in VM

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #2459

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#2459

From: Checkpoint Technologies
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 1989 16:43

9 lines
906 bytes

In article <4643@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>
>Really, I don't see the point of writing stuff to one part of the disk when
>you're just going to have to read it in again and write it to another part
>of the disk later on.
>
	Well put. Virtual memory actually is at it's best when it's
*not* *being* *used*, or in other words, there's just no good substitute
for real memory.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14066@grebyn.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!haven!grebyn!ckp

References: <14059@grebyn.com> <2054@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> <14060@grebyn.com> <4643@sugar.hackercorp.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!haven!grebyn!ckp
From: ckp@grebyn.com (Checkpoint Technologies)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: DMA in VM
Message-ID: <14066@grebyn.com>
Date: 1 Dec 89 16:43:24 GMT
References: <14059@grebyn.com> <2054@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> <14060@grebyn.com> <4643@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Reply-To: ckp@grebyn.UUCP (Checkpoint Technologies)
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing, Vienna, VA, USA
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message