Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #2502Re: RS232 gender (was Re: Apple SCSI not compatible with standard SCSI?)
From: Larry Phillips
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1989 05:18
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1989 05:18
25 lines
1692 bytes
1692 bytes
In <503@shodha.dec.com>, ridder@elvira.cxo3.dec.com (Hans Ridder) writes:
>RS-232 (now EIA-232) has, for quite a while specified the gender of
>connectors. My copy of the standard, dated August 1969, says it on
>page 7 section 3.1. The language is a bit difficult, but is basically
>gets around to saying that female connectors are for DCE's (modems),
>and male connectors are for DTE's (terminals and to most people,
>computers). So, IBM followed the standard, not the bandwagon.
The last time I read the spec, which was when I made a statement about the
gender issue, and was corrected, it did not state the gender for the DTE. I
would be interested in knowing if your copy of the spec actually says that or
if you are just choosing to interpret it that way.
I am not interested in gender wars. I am interested in facts.
-larry
--
" All I ask of my body is that it carry around my head."
- Thomas Alva Edison -
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| // Larry Phillips |
| \X/ lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
| COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 -or- 76703.4322@compuserve.com |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<856@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc! From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: RS232 gender (was Re: Apple SCSI not compatible with standard SCSI?) Message-ID: <856@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> Date: 2 Dec 89 05:18:15 GMT Lines: 25 Return-Path: <lpami!lphillips> To: van-bc!rnews