Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #2557DMA vs Non-DMA
From: Eduardo Horvath
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 1989 15:16
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 1989 15:16
17 lines
1198 bytes
1198 bytes
Just as I thought that the argument over whether DMA is good was finally
settled I came up with a nasty rumor. Tryning to remember exacly what was
said last night:
Is there a bug with the Amiga DMA scheme that causes data to be lost
under some obcure conditions, or is that somebody mis-reading
a 2090 review again?
At the very least I would like to have enough ammunition to stamp out
any nasty little rumors like this before they start, unless they are accurate,
in which case theyshould be documented.
----
Eduardo Horvath | 33014-18@sjsumcs.SJSU.EDU | IMI - International Microsystems
"Why don't you stop your whining, and get back to work!"
- Doctor Science
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Dec6.151618.3097@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!vsi1!octopus!sjsumcs!33014-18References:
<1989Dec1.152959.5833@dvinci.usask.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!vsi1!octopus!sjsumcs!33014-18 From: 33014-18@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu (Eduardo Horvath) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: DMA vs Non-DMA Summary: Are there problems with DMA? Message-ID: <1989Dec6.151618.3097@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> Date: 6 Dec 89 15:16:18 GMT References: <1989Dec1.152959.5833@dvinci.usask.ca> Reply-To: 33014-18@sjsumcs.SJSU.EDU (Eduardo Horvath) Organization: San Jose State University Lines: 17