Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #2614Re: What should be in future SKsh versions?
From: Miles Bader
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1989 17:33
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1989 17:33
17 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
koren@hpfelg.HP.COM (Steve Koren) writes: > > Or... don't tell me... which is another built-in? > > > Hey, Steve. You want to cut a whole bunch of stuff out of sksh? Get rid > > of all the builtins! > > I like this idea, though I think the best route is to supply two binaries, > one with the builtins and one without. Hard drive users tell me "get rid of > the builtins" and floppy users tell me "add more builtins". I don't think > I can get rid of *all* the builtins (like the exit command, for example), > but certainly many of them. Why exactly do you need builtins at all, even on a floppy disk, given the existance of REZ? [Which has the large advantage of letting the USER decide which commands take up memory space...] -Miles
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<AZTz25K00Uka8Bt052@andrew.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!bader+References:
<13920018@hpfelg.HP.COM>, <13920026@hpfelg.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!bader+ From: bader+@andrew.cmu.edu (Miles Bader) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: What should be in future SKsh versions? Message-ID: <AZTz25K00Uka8Bt052@andrew.cmu.edu> Date: 8 Dec 89 17:33:57 GMT References: <13920018@hpfelg.HP.COM>, <13920026@hpfelg.HP.COM> Organization: Information Technology Center, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 17 In-Reply-To: <13920026@hpfelg.HP.COM>