Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #2961Re: Wildcards
From: Dave Haynie
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 1990 15:26
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 1990 15:26
55 lines
2814 bytes
2814 bytes
In article <102618@linus.UUCP> duncant@mbunix.mitre.org (Thomson) writes:
>In article peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>>Scripts would probably run with quotewild on by default, and the more powerful
>>amiga-style wildcards, and interactive shells would turn quotewild off and use
>>the terser unix-style wildcards.
>|I am surprised at the use of the phrase "more powerful amiga-style wildcards".
>More powerful than what? Everything you can do with # and ? you can doo
>with * and ?, not jsut on unix, but also on VMS and (to some extent) on DOS.
Really? I think you should read up on AmigaDOS wildcards (and probably UNIX
too). Using just * and ?, please construct a single pattern that meets
these requirements:
MATCH DON'T MATCH
Foo.Bar Fxx.Bxr
Foo.Baar Fx.Bxxxr
Fo.Baaar
The answer, in AmigaDOS-speak, using only the # and ? metacharacters (which
is an absurd example, since most interesting cases, rather than this
carefully constructed on, often use at the (, ), and | metacharacters):
F#o.B#ar
You can make a pattern that'll match that in UNIX, but not with your
restricted set of * and ? only.
>I never understood where the AmigaDos wildcard conventions came from.
Well, TriPos, basically. But the logic behind it is that, rather than
simple wildcards, you have a reasonable regular expression language.
The "*" convention would be a waste of a metacharacter. The one that's
missing (but hopefully in 1.4) is a negation character.
>Why deviate from a widely used convention in favor of a new one which
>noone is familiar with?
Only the degenerate case of *? is widely used, and even then, the actual
meaning varies between systems. If you don't believe that, try just *
under Apollo's DomainOS/Aegis sometime. The obvious answer to your
question, of course, is the standard one: new conventions are adpoted
because they are considered better. That's why I traded my C128 for an
Amiga in the first place, why I program in C or C++ most of the time
rather than BASIC, why I find a GUI occasionally useful even though it's
not as "widely used" as a command-line interface. Etc.
>Duncan Thomson
--
Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Systems Engineering) "The Crew That Never Rests"
{uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh PLINK: hazy BIX: hazy
Too much of everything is just enough
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10210@cbmvax.commodore.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!rutgers!cbmvax!davehReferences:
<102618@linus.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!rutgers!cbmvax!daveh From: daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Wildcards Message-ID: <10210@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 16 Mar 90 15:26:33 GMT References: <102618@linus.UUCP> Reply-To: daveh@cbmvax (Dave Haynie) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 55