🚀 go-pugleaf

Andy:

Sorry, I don't see what the problem is. If a 2.0 partition has a boot
priority of 1 and a 1.3 partition has a boot priority of 2 for example,
the 2.0 partition should boot - thereby assigning all C:'s, DEVS:, LIBS:,
etc. to the correct directories on that partition as according to its
startup-sequence. If the priorities were reversed, than the 1.3 partition
would boot up accordingly - with 1.3 assignments.

I can see no conflict between making bootable 2.0 partitions readable
from bootable 1.3 paritions, or vice-versa. Just treat them as separate
devices, much like DF0: and DF1:. Surely you're not going to say that DIR
and LIST has problems with this concept? If each partition has a unique
name, you could use them instead when you're CD'ing or DIR'ing around.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Dallas J. Hodgson               |     "This here's the wattle,             |
| Metaphor Computer Systems       |      It's the emblem of our land.        |
| Mountain View, Ca.              |      You can put it in a bottle,         |
| USENET : djh@metaphor.com       |      You can hold it in your hand."      |
+============================================================================+
| "The views I express are my own, and not necessarily those of my employer" |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+