🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #3556

Re: gadgets in 2.0

#3556
From: Peter Cherna
Date: Wed, 09 May 1990 16:29
41 lines
2533 bytes
In article <609@teslab.lab.OZ> andrew@teslab.lab.oz.au (Andrew Phillips  289 8712) writes:
>In article <5185@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> barrett@jhunix.UUCP (Dan Barrett) writes:
>>And Pascal and Modula2 can indeed call routines that have an arbitrary
>>number of arguments.  Consider "writeln()", for example.
>
>This is incorrect.  Writeln() is not a real function/procedure but is
>part of the Pascal language.

Pascal has nice strong typing rules.  It was designed to be a good choice
as a first language (not to denigrate its power at all, but rather to
point out its singular strength).  Sadly, when I was in school at
the level where people were learning to program (not that long ago, I'm
not that old :-) ), the mindset was that people should begin with BASIC
before moving on to the advanced languages like Pascal or C or Fortran.
The fortunate among us were able to forget the mistakes we learned in BASIC
and learn to organize and structure ourselves the way Pascal required.

Pascal requires that all functions have fixed strongly-typed arguments.
Excellent idea, but even they had to admit that the real-world demands
some tradeoffs of idealism/structure vs. efficiency, and writeln() was
Pascal's sheepish concession.  Conversely, C has gone too far, though
ANSI has brought it back some.

>There is also a problem for C in that although C allows a variable
>number of parameters some compilers have a maximum limit (e.g. 20).

Generally not on the Amiga.  The standard C-style calling convention
puts arguments on the stack, so you can pile them up until you blow
your stack.

>Andrew.
>-- 
>Andrew Phillips (andrew@teslab.lab.oz.au) Phone +61 (Aust) 2 (Sydney) 289 8712

     Peter
--
     Peter Cherna, Software Engineer, Commodore-Amiga, Inc.
     {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!peter    peter@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com
My opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer.
"If you insist on spending $10000 on a 68030 technology, may we humbly
suggest you buy three Amiga 3000's."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <11472@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!rutgers!cbmvax!peter
References: <1990May6.183020.17956@calgary.uucp> <5185@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> <609@teslab.lab.OZ>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!rutgers!cbmvax!peter
From: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: gadgets in 2.0
Keywords: gadgets 2.0
Message-ID: <11472@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 9 May 90 16:29:45 GMT
References: <1990May6.183020.17956@calgary.uucp> <5185@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> <609@teslab.lab.OZ>
Reply-To: peter@cbmvax (Peter Cherna)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
Lines: 41