Re: A68k vs Lattice 'C'

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #3579

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#3579

From: BAXTER_A
Date: Fri, 25 May 1990 14:32

13 lines
1045 bytes

In article <136136@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>, cmcmanis@stpeter.Eng.Sun.COM (Chuck McManis) writes:
> In article <2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> ( Michael S Figg) writes:
>>How does learning assembly on the Amiga with A68k differ from using the
>>assembler with Lattice 'C'? Are there substantial differences? Do I gain
>>much from using one over the other?
> 
> Well I don't know but I do know that Xoper which is supposed to assemble
> with the A68k assembler does _not_ assemble with the Lattice asm assembler.
>
 And I know that overscan which _does_ assemble with something _doesn't_
assemble with the Lattice asm assembler.

Regards Alan

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8243@wehi.dn.mu.oz>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc!wehi!baxter_a

References: <2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <136136@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc!wehi!baxter_a
From: BAXTER_A@wehi.dn.mu.oz
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: A68k vs Lattice 'C'
Message-ID: <8243@wehi.dn.mu.oz>
Date: 25 May 90 14:32:35 GMT
References: <2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <136136@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Organization: Walter & Eliza Hall Institute
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message