Re: A68k vs Lattice 'C'

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #3595

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#3595

From: John Schultz
Date: Sat, 26 May 1990 17:00

12 lines
1021 bytes

In article <11834@cbmvax.commodore.com> jesup@cbmvax (Randell Jesup) writes:
>	Cape V2.5 has '020/'030 (and I think '881/2) support.

  I just checked, I've got CAPE version 67, release 2.5. It didn't handle
a simple muls.l d0,d1 (invalid addressing mode was the error). I talked to
Inovatronics a few months ago, and it didn't sound like an 020/030 version
was to appear anytime soon. They suggested using dc's to get the necessary
instructions.


  John

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2829@crash.cts.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!jcs

References: <2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <2812@crash.cts.com> <11834@cbmvax.commodore.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!jcs
From: jcs@crash.cts.com (John Schultz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: A68k vs Lattice 'C'
Keywords: asm a68k lattice
Message-ID: <2829@crash.cts.com>
Date: 26 May 90 17:00:38 GMT
References: <2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <2812@crash.cts.com> <11834@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA
Lines: 12
X-Local-Date: 26 May 90 10:00:38 PDT

Reply to Parent Message