🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1990May27.101258.24470@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>, xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes:
>
>The Amiga 3000 is capable of holding (at least supporting) much more memory
>than a Cray 1, and the size of gates in modern memory is much smaller and
>thus they are more susceptable to alpha radiation induced parity errors than
>were the gates of the Cray memory.
>
>To take an Amiga seriously as a commercial machine in the "workstation,
>large memory" market, I'd guess error correcting code will turn out to be
>vital.  It would be a shame to have a big production run of the hardware
>installed and on the street, only to have parity problems give the machine
>a reputation as an unreliable machine, to be avoided in droves.  Better if
>the problem is solved before the reputation is besmirched.

Right.. ECC is not parity, and vice versa. Parity checking is totally,
completely, and utterly useless.

>But then, what do I know after 29 years in the field about what people who
>buy the machines look for in a large processor?  My computer purchases were
>limited to a couple of million bucks worth, down in the noise level in the
>marketplace.  ;-)

Geez... out-yeared me by 3. :-)

-larry

--
The raytracer of justice recurses slowly, but it renders exceedingly fine.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
|   //   Larry Phillips                                                 |
| \X/    lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips |
|        COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322  -or-  76703.4322@compuserve.com        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+