Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #3682Re: A68k vs Lattice 'C'
From: John Schultz
Date: Thu, 31 May 1990 03:24
Date: Thu, 31 May 1990 03:24
18 lines
1139 bytes
1139 bytes
In article <1990May29.122539.18550@gdr.bath.ac.uk> mapjilg@gdr.bath.ac.uk (J I L Gold) writes: [stuff deleted, refering to 68020/30 assemblers] >They do now! There is a Devpac Proffesional package out now, at a much higher >price, it has to be said. Cool, what's the cost? >Well just try the equivalent of INCBIN with either Lattice OR current versions >of A68k (I've mailed Charlie Gibbs, the author, and he's said the next version >will have it.) Ok, just write a little program to convert binary to dc's :-). Devpac's so fast that even large iff images are quickly assembled. Of course INCBIN is still a nice feature. John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2911@crash.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdsu!crash!jcsReferences:
<2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <2812@crash.cts.com> <1990May29.122539.18550@gdr.bath.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdsu!crash!jcs From: jcs@crash.cts.com (John Schultz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: A68k vs Lattice 'C' Keywords: asm a68k lattice Message-ID: <2911@crash.cts.com> Date: 31 May 90 03:24:14 GMT References: <2196@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <2812@crash.cts.com> <1990May29.122539.18550@gdr.bath.ac.uk> Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA Lines: 18