🚀 go-pugleaf

walker@sas.UUCP (Doug Walker) writes:
>In article <17315@gryphon.COM> ddave@pnet02.cts.com (David Donley) writes:
>>CPR takes up about 3 times as much memory as the manx SDB, and is slower. 
>
>I don't know where you get your information, but according to Victor Wagner's
>comparison in Transactor for the Amiga, CPR and SDB take up approximately the
>same amount of memory.  
>
>In what way is CPR slower than SDB?  I haven't heard that complaint before.
>If you're using memory watchpoints, CPR is quite slow, but then again SDB
>doesn't support memory watchpoints.  What you really need for that is some
>kind of hardware debugging board.
>
>>Lattice turnes a 155K program into a 650K one when you turn on debug, Manx
>>just adds an extra .DBG file of about 100K.
>
>Restructuring the debugging information is high on the list for the 6.0 release.
>We discovered the problems with the current format too late and decided that
>it would be better to get the product in the hands of the users and then
>improve it than hold off another six months to improve the debug information.
>
>--Doug


Manx does support memory watchpoints.  The Lattice debugger takes a lot more
memory when you start debugging a large program, because it starts dumping
lots of stuff in a temporary ram file.  It also takes memory because it has to
load the 650K executable in, while the MANX one only loads a 150K executable
and reads the 100K file off the disk (Well, on my harddisk, the MANX is faster
- on a floppy, I guess the Lattice would be faster since it uses more ram)

and doesn't read the structures defs off the disk.  I would be interested in
knowing how large the program was that the reviewer used to do his test.

 _               _
| \ _   ___ _   | \ _    | _    Call THE Bug Eyes BBS at (213) 372-4494.
|_//-\\/_|_|_)  |_/(_)/\/||_-\/ Life is too short for copy-protection-
^[33m^[41mANSI is my life!^[m/  and should be even shorter for pirates!
Send mail to: ddave@pnet02.CTS.COM or killer!gryphon!pnet02!ddave NO FLAMES!