C compilers

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #4266

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#4266

From: Bruce Albrecht
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 1990 14:25

15 lines
1353 bytes

Now that I have a 3000 on order, I figure it's time to start thinking about
compilers...  and maybe start some compiler wars.  Which commercial C compiler
is better, Aztec or Lattice?  What do you get extra in the Aztec Developer
version that's not in Aztec Professional?  Is the Lattice C++ a preprocessor,
like the original C++, or a complete compiler like the newer versions
elsewhere?  Is Lattice C++ based on C 5.05, or an earlier version?  If you
buy C++, do you really need a C compiler as well?  Are Aztec and Lattice both
ANSI C compliant?  I have heard that C programs written for one of the
commercial C compilers can be compiled on the other, but the converse is not
true.  Which compiler is it that compiles code written for either one?
Thanks...

UUCP: {amdahl!bungia, uunet!rosevax, crash}!orbit!pnet51!bga
ARPA: crash!orbit!pnet51!bga@nosc.mil
INET: bga@pnet51.orb.mn.org

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2744@orbit.cts.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!orbit!pnet51!bga

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!orbit!pnet51!bga
From: bga@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Bruce Albrecht)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: C compilers
Message-ID: <2744@orbit.cts.com>
Date: 1 Jul 90 14:25:47 GMT
Sender: news@orbit.cts.com
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.
Lines: 15
X-Local-Date: 1 Jul 90 07:25:47 PDT