Re: Whats wrong with self Modifying Code?

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #4270

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#4270

From: Kim DeVaughn
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 1990 19:29

22 lines
1259 bytes

In article <13104@cbmvax.commodore.com>, valentin@cbmvax.commodore.com (Valentin Pepelea) writes:
>
> An alternate solution to clearing the caches
> is to declare regions of memory as non-cacheable.

Does the 3000 provide for non-cacheable memory, and if so, does 2.0 support
it?  How does the user control/specify this?  Come to think of it, just how
does the user specify xlation tables, etc in general?

On a related note, anyone know if Lattice/Manx/DICE support "volatile"
correctly?

/kim

-- 
UUCP:  kim@uts.amdahl.com   -OR-   ked01@juts.ccc.amdahl.com
  or:  {sun,decwrl,hplabs,pyramid,uunet,oliveb,ames}!amdahl!kim
DDD:   408-746-8462
USPS:  Amdahl Corp.  M/S 249,  1250 E. Arques Av,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086
BIX:   kdevaughn     GEnie:   K.DEVAUGHN     CIS:   76535,25

Technical Details

Message-ID: <a8x802lO01Rq01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!amdahl!JUTS!ked01

References: <1990Jul6.201328.24660@csmil.umich.edu> <13104@cbmvax.commodore.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!amdahl!JUTS!ked01
From: ked01@ccc.amdahl.com (Kim DeVaughn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Whats wrong with self Modifying Code?
Keywords: religion, gurus, whats up?
Message-ID: <a8x802lO01Rq01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>
Date: 7 Jul 90 19:29:50 GMT
References: <1990Jul6.201328.24660@csmil.umich.edu> <13104@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Organization: Amdahl Corporation,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message