Re: Lattice C v. Aztec C

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #4303

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#4303

From: Peter da Silva
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 1990 13:16

8 lines
725 bytes

Lattice C was there first. Also, Commodore's examples have been in Lattice C.

I believe that the new Lattice produces better code than Aztec, but then the
new Aztec is supposed to have swapped this over again.

-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6019@sugar.hackercorp.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!sugar!peter

References: <544@beguine.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!rutgers!ucsd!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Lattice C v. Aztec C
Message-ID: <6019@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 10 Jul 90 13:16:29 GMT
References: <544@beguine.UUCP>
Reply-To: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message