Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #4359Re: Lattice vs Manx
From: BAXTER_A
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 1990 23:05
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 1990 23:05
21 lines
1259 bytes
1259 bytes
In article <544@beguine.UUCP>, Scott.Maxwell@samba.acs.unc.edu (BBS Account) writes: > Uh, I'm a little confused by what I've read regarding Lattice C v. Aztec > C. Everybody seems to say (a) Aztec usually produces faster code, (b) Aztec > usually produces the code faster (that is to say, it compiles faster), > (c) Aztec is cheaper, and (d) Lattice is more widely used. > Now, that can't all be right -- unless Lattice has *vastly* superior > advertising or something, and I can't imagine that would be enough to make the > difference. Assuming I'm right about points (a), (b) and (c), though, why the > heck is (d) true? Does Lattice offer better support? What have I missed? > > -- > Scott Maxwell (CSMAXWEL@ECUVM1.BITNET or Scott.Maxwell@samba.acs.unc.edu) When it comes to compiler writing, "You can do it; or you can do it RIGHT." Manx do it. Regards Alan
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10018@wehi.dn.mu.oz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc!wehi!baxter_aReferences:
<544@beguine.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc!wehi!baxter_a From: BAXTER_A@wehi.dn.mu.oz Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Lattice vs Manx Message-ID: <10018@wehi.dn.mu.oz> Date: 12 Jul 90 23:05:53 GMT References: <544@beguine.UUCP> Organization: Walter & Eliza Hall Institute Lines: 21