Re: Compare Quantam and Seagate?

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech

Article #4535

Back to comp.sys.amiga.tech Previous Next

#4535

From: Salim Alam
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 1990 22:21

9 lines
722 bytes

All this fuss about Seagate vs Quantam...

I have been using a Seagate 157N for about a year, absolutely no
problems. I am very happy with it, and considering the price was
so low, if I had the opportunity to I would buy Seagate again.

So there!

[A voice in the darkness..?]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <146@ub.d.umn.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ub.d.umn.edu!salam

References: <3644@crash.cts.com> <9798@hubcap.clemson.edu> <9498@pogo.WV.TEK.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ub.d.umn.edu!salam
From: salam@ub.d.umn.edu (Salim Alam)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Compare Quantam and Seagate?
Message-ID: <146@ub.d.umn.edu>
Date: 24 Jul 90 22:21:11 GMT
References: <3644@crash.cts.com> <9798@hubcap.clemson.edu> <9498@pogo.WV.TEK.COM>
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth. Information Services.
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message